There is no compelling evidence of a mysterious physical height difference hidden from the public.
The couple were commonly reported to be close in height.
Photographs showing major differences can be explained by ordinary factors, including footwear, perspective, posture, camera positioning, and differences in elevation.
In the much-discussed Balmoral image, Diana’s seated position provides the essential explanation.
Other photographs are more complicated because their exact circumstances may not be immediately apparent.
Some formal portraits support the observation that Charles was presented as taller.
But whether each arrangement was intentional, and what motivated it, cannot be established simply by looking at the final picture.
The distinction is important.
A visual pattern may exist without every example having the same explanation.
And an interesting sociological interpretation does not automatically transform an ordinary photograph into proof of a coordinated effort.The most reasonable conclusion is therefore a balanced one.
The apparent height differences are real features of the photographs, but they do not necessarily represent the couple’s actual physical proportions.
